Antibacterial Activities of Methanolic Seeds Extract of Black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) against Gram Positive Staphylococcus aureus & Gram-Negative Escherichia coli.

Evaluation of the in vitro antibacterial activity of Methanolic extracts isolated from Black pepper seeds (Piper nigrum L.) against two infection causing pathogens, Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus and Gram-negative Escherichia coli. Between July 2022 and June 2023, this experimental study was conducted at the Mymensingh Medical College's Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics in conjunction with the Department of Microbiology. Using the disc diffusion and broth dilution methods, the antibacterial activity of methanolic extract of black pepper seeds (MBPE) was evaluated at various doses. The solvents Methanol and 10.0% Di Methyl Sulfoxide (DMSO) were used to make the extract. Using the broth dilution procedure, the conventional antibiotic Ciprofloxacin was utilized and the outcome was contrasted with that of Methanol extracts. Methanolic extract of black pepper seeds (MBPE) at seven distinct concentrations (100, 80, 60, 40, 20, 10 and 5 mg/ml) were utilized, then later in chosen concentrations as needed to confirm the extracts' more precise margin of antimicrobial sensitivity. At 80 mg/ml and above doses of the MBPE, it had an inhibitory impact against the aforementioned microorganisms. For Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli the MIC were 60 and 75 mg/ml in MBPE respectively. As of the MIC of Ciprofloxacin was 1µg/ml against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. In comparison to MICs of MBPE for the test organisms, the MIC of Ciprofloxacin was the lowest. This study clearly shows that Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli are sensitive to the methanolic extract of black pepper seeds' antibacterial properties.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Amlodipine and Losartan Potassium in Essential Hypertension in a Tertiary Hospital of Bangladesh.

Hypertension is a common disorder of major clinical, public health and economic importance. It affects men and women of all ages, and the prevalence is increasing in most countries. Maintenance of blood pressure below 140/90 mm of Hg is recommended by most of the guideline available around the world. Various classes of drugs are being used in the treatment of hypertension. Losartan potassium and amlodipine are two different antihypertensive agents belonging to two different groups used commonly around the world in treating essential hypertension. Losartan potassium is non-peptide Angiotensin-II receptor antagonist. Amlodipine which is the third generation dihydropyridine group of calcium channel blocker. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of amlodipine and losartan for the treatment of essential hypertensive patients (18-75 years). A non-randomized comparative observational study was conducted in the Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics in collaboration with Department of Medicine, Sylhet, MAG Osmani Medical College, Sylhet, Bangladesh from July 2021 to June 2022. In this study non-randomization was in two groups. Group A received amlodipine 5mg daily at morning and Group B received losartan potassium 50mg daily at night. The study parameters were systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), ankle oedema, serum K+ level. The result of treatment outcome was compared between two groups. After treatment the reduction of SBP was 5.19±2.93mm of Hg versus 3.27±1.34mm of Hg (p<0.001); reduction of DBP was 1.7±0.70 mm of Hg versus 0.68 mm of Hg (p<0.001) and serum K+ level 4.22±0.27mmol/L versus 4.21±0.16mmol/L (p<0.719) in amlodipine and losartan group respectively. Amlodipine is more effective than losartan potassium in respect to treatment of essential hypertension. Regarding adverse events losartan potassium causes angioedema, hyperkalemia, headache, dizziness etc. The study concluded that amlodipine is superior to losartan potassium in treating essential hypertension.

Pattern of Prescribing Drugs in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Bangladesh.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic obstructive disease of the airways. It is one of the most common and important chronic respiratory conditions in terms of years lived with disability. Incidence is increasing in Bangladesh like other developing countries. To evaluate drug prescription pattern for COPD, this cross-sectional, observational study was conducted from January to December in 2020 at the Department of Pharmacology in collaboration with the Department of Medicine in Mymensingh Medical College, Bangladesh. A total of 168 patients were selected for the study by non-random purposive sampling technique. Age distribution indicates that 31.5% of patients were in the 50-59 years age group and males were 93.5%. The majority (82.1%) of the participants were smokers. In this study, majority (34.12%) of the drugs were used as oral form and second most common dosage form was nebulization (26.75%). Bronchodilators were mostly prescribed 652(57.19%), followed by corticosteroids 222(19.47%) and antibiotics 165(14.47%) among drugs used for COPD. Beta sympathomimetics 322(45.49%) were mostly prescribed, followed by anticholinergics 186(28.52%) and methylxanthines 144(22.08%) as bronchodilators. Out of 1140 drugs for COPD, 53.06% and 34.12% were delivered as inhalation and oral forms, respectively. Inhalation route was the most (60.37%) preferred one over oral route (37.63%) for steroid use. The most of the patients [152 (90.48%)] were treated with combination therapy. Mostly (39.6%) used Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) therapy was salbutamol and ipratropium bromide followed by salmeteroal and Fluticasone (30.83%). Both FDC were prescribed in 57.7% of study population. Considering nomenclature, trade name was used in 24.4% of prescription.

Antibacterial Activities of Mint (Mentha piperita) Leaf Extracts (Aqueous) Against Two Food Borne infection causing pathogens: Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli.

Evaluation of the in vitro antibacterial activity of Aqueous extracts isolated from Mint (Mentha piperita) leaf against two food born infection causing pathogens, gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus and gram-negative Escherichia coli. This interventional study was carried out in the Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics in collaboration with the Department of Microbiology, Mymensingh Medical College, Bangladesh from January 2021 to December 2021. The antibacterial activity was tested at different concentrations of Aqueous Mint leaf extracts by using disc diffusion & broth dilution method. The extract was prepared by using solvents Aqueous. The test microorganisms were also tested for their activity against a standard antibiotic Gentamicin by broth dilution method and the result was compared with that of Aqueous extracts. Aqueous extract of Mint leaves (AMLE) were used initially in eight different concentrations (25, 50, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800 and 1000µg/ml) and later in selected concentrations as needed to confirm the more precise margin of antimicrobial sensitivity of the extracts. Among different concentrations of the AMLE, 200µg/ml and above concentrations showed inhibitory effect against Staphylococcus aureus and 400µg/ml and above concentrations showed inhibitory effect against Escherichia coli. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli were 200 and 400µg/ml in AMLE respectively. The MIC of Gentamicin was 1µg/ml against Staphylococcus aureus and 1.5µg/ml against Escherichia coli. The MIC of Gentamicin was the lowest in comparison to MICs of AMLE for the test organisms. This study showed that Aqueous Mint extracts demonstrated antibacterial effects against food borne pathogens. It is clearly observed that there is definite antibacterial effect of the aqueous extract of Mint leaves against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli.